/Charging decision to be announced in Atlanta police shooting death of Rayshard Brooks

Charging decision to be announced in Atlanta police shooting death of Rayshard Brooks

(Reuters) – A Georgia county prosecutor is set to announce on Wednesday whether a fired Atlanta police officer will face criminal charges in the shooting death of Rayshard Brooks in the parking lot of a Wendy’s fast-food restaurant last week.

FILE PHOTO: Protesters rally against racial inequality and the police shooting death of Rayshard Brooks, in Atlanta, Georgia, U.S. June 13, 2020. REUTERS/Elijah Nouvelage/File Photo

The death of Brooks – another in a long line of African-Americans killed by police – further heightened racial concerns in the United States at a time of national soul-searching over racism and police brutality.

Fulton County District Attorney Paul Howard has scheduled a news conference for 3 p.m. EDT (1900 GMT) to announce whether the officer who shot Brooks on June 12, Garrett Rolfe, and another officer on the scene, Devin Brosnan, will face criminal charges.

Rolfe was fired after surveillance video showed his actions in the incident. Brosnan has been placed on administrative leave. Rolfe and Brosnan are white.

Howard has said any charges would likely be murder or felony murder, as Howard believed Brooks posed no threat and gunning him down was an unreasonable use of force. Howard has said voluntary manslaughter was also a possible charge.

The killing of Brooks came amid ongoing protests in U.S. cities prompted by the May 25 death of an African-American man named George Floyd after a white Minneapolis police officer knelt on his neck for nearly nine minutes while detaining him. That officer, Derek Chauvin, was charged with second-degree murder.

Page Pate, a criminal defense attorney in Georgia who is not involved in the case, said Howard’s decision would hinge on whether he believed Rolfe had reason to fear for his life. Manslaughter, Pate added, was not an appropriate charge for the case.

“It’s either murder or it’s nothing,” Pate said, adding that he believes Rolfe should be charged because he was not “facing a serious risk of death or bodily injury” when he fired his gun.

Lance LoRusso, a lawyer who is defending Atlanta police officers in a separate case involving the use of Taser weapons, said Rolfe was justified in shooting Brooks, who in security videos appears to have turned toward Rolfe with a Taser device before being shot.

“All the officer knew is that he (Brooks) turned, pointed something at him and fired. That’s a deadly threat,” LoRusso said.

Brooks, 27, was reported asleep in a car in the drive-through lane of a Wendy’s, blocking traffic. A restaurant employee called the 911 emergency telephone line, complaining about a man who would not move the vehicle and appeared intoxicated.

After interaction with Rolfe and a second white officer at the scene, Devin Brosnan, Brooks tussled with the officers and ran off with one of their Taser devices.

An autopsy conducted on Sunday showed that Brooks was shot twice in the back and died from blood loss and organ injuries. The local medical examiner’s office ruled the death a homicide.

Vince Champion, southeast regional director for the International Brotherhood of Police Officers union, noted that Howard’s office had referred to a Taser as a “deadly weapon” in charging documents for Atlanta police officers involved using the devices on two college students last month.

“If the Taser is a deadly weapon and that was pointed at our officer he has full authority to use deadly force,” Champion said.

Reporting by Nathan Layne in Wilton, Connecticut and Rich McKay in Atlanta; Editing by Will Dunham

Original Source